Are Random Drift and Natural Selection Conceptually Distinct?
نویسنده
چکیده
The latter half of the twentieth century has been marked by debates in evolutionary biology over the relative significance of natural selection and random drift: the so-called “neutralist/selectionist” debates. Yet John Beatty has argued that it is difficult, if not impossible, to distinguish the concept of random drift from the concept of natural selection, a claim that has been accepted by many philosophers of biology. If this claim is correct, then the neutralist/selectionist debates seem at best futile, and at worst, meaningless. I reexamine the issues that Beatty raises, and argue that random drift and natural selection, conceived as processes, can be distinguished from one another.
منابع مشابه
Mutational Pressure Drives Evolution of Synonymous Codon Usage in Genetically Distinct Oenothera plastomes
Background: Most of the amino acids are encoded by more than one codon, termed as synonymous codons. Synonymous codon usage is not random as it is unique to species. In each amino acid family, some synonymous codons are preferred and this is referred to as synonymous codon usage bias (SCUB). Trends associated with evolution of SCUB and factors influencing its diversification in plastomes of gen...
متن کاملDescended from Darwin
Introduction Recently, much philosophical discussion has centered on the best way to characterize the concepts of random drift 1 and natural selection, and, in particular, whether selection and drift can be conceptually distinguished 2 These authors all contend, to a greater or lesser degree, that their concepts make sense of biological practice. So it should be instructive to see how the conce...
متن کاملThe Role of Causal Processes in the Neutral and Nearly Neutral Theories*
In this paper, we will consider how the neutral and nearly neutral theories of molecular evolution differ from each other as a means for addressing causal processes associated with random drift and natural selection. These two theories are sometimes characterized as theories about drift alone, where drift is described solely as an outcome, rather than a process. Contra this characterization, we...
متن کاملHow Do Natural Selection and Random Drift Interact?
One controversy about the existence of so called evolutionary forces such as natural selection and random genetic drift concerns the sense in which such “forces” can be said to interact. In this paper I explain how natural selection and random drift can interact. In particular, I show how population-level probabilities can be derived from individual-level probabilities, and explain the sense in...
متن کاملWright's Shifting Balance Theory and the Diversification of Aposematic Signals
Despite accumulating evidence for selection within natural systems, the importance of random genetic drift opposing Wright's and Fisher's views of evolution continue to be a subject of controversy. The geographical diversification of aposematic signals appears to be a suitable system to assess the factors involved in the process of adaptation since both theories were independently proposed to e...
متن کامل